Mapping Actors in the Scientific Network and Their Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Abstract

This case study investigates the intricate network of actors involved in human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research and the factors influencing their interactions and contributions to scientific advancement. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, including bibliometric analysis, social network analysis, and qualitative inquiry, the research examines the composition, structure, and dynamics of the scientific network surrounding hESC research. By mapping the collaborative relationships among researchers, institutions, and countries, the study identifies key actors, central nodes, and collaborative patterns within the hESC research community. Furthermore, it explores the influencing factors driving collaboration and knowledge exchange, including scientific prestige, funding sources, regulatory frameworks, ethical considerations, and intellectual property rights. Through in-depth interviews and content analysis, the study elucidates the motivations, challenges, and strategies employed by actors in navigating the complex landscape of hESC research. The findings shed light on the mechanisms through which collaborative networks evolve, innovate, and contribute to scientific progress in the field of regenerative medicine. Moreover, they provide insights into the broader socio-political and ethical dimensions shaping the development and dissemination of hESC research, offering implications for policy, governance, and research management. By unraveling the dynamics of scientific collaboration and its underlying drivers within the context of hESC research, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the interplay between actors, institutions, and influencing factors in advancing biomedical innovation and addressing societal challenges.