A Cognitive Study of Technology Hazard: Exploring Differences among Classical Theories

Abstract

This paper undertakes a cognitive study to examine technology hazards, exploring variations among classical theories. Drawing upon cognitive science, risk perception theory, and technology studies, we analyze how individuals perceive and understand technological hazards through the lens of different theoretical frameworks. Through a comparative analysis of classical theories such as Normal Accident Theory, High Reliability Theory, and Socio-Technical Systems Theory, we investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying hazard recognition, assessment, and response. Additionally, we explore the implications of these differences in theoretical perspectives for risk management, regulation, and public policy. The insights derived from this study offer valuable implications for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers seeking to develop more effective strategies for identifying, mitigating, and communicating technology hazards in diverse socio-technical contexts.